🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation and Ideology

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for using excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.